One public profile
$28.49Up to 200 reviewed followers200-profile sample
Deep Instagram follower audit for fake accounts
A random follower sample is checked profile by profile for posts, activity signals, and following patterns.
Random selection, not simply the first 200 recent followers.
Stuck? Message us and we'll sort it out.
Profile found
followers
following
Profile found
What this profile is ready for right now
Before checkout
How to check followers for bots
The report draws a random sample of up to two hundred followers and opens each profile separately: profile photo, posts, the ratio of following to followers. Two hundred profiles describe the audience as a whole, not the state of every single follower, and there is deliberately no exact bot percentage — such a figure would be invented. The report shows the signals and the sample size, and the reading is yours.
Inside the result
What is reviewed
- 01Random sample of 200
- 02Posts and activity signals
- 03Follower/following balance
- 04Profiles listed for manual review
Example format
What the sample breakdown looks like
This is a demonstration of the format, not data from a real profile. A purchased result contains rows for the public account you specify.
Three steps
Why this check goes deeper
- 01
Collect the audience
Recent positions receive no special preference.
- 02
Sample randomly
Older bursts are not hidden behind recent followers.
- 03
Review individually
Each sampled public profile is checked separately.
No hidden tiers
Report price
A fixed random sample of up to 200 followers.
FAQ
What to know about the sample
01Why not check the first 200?
The first entries tend to be recent, while an older burst may sit deeper in the list.
02Does this produce an exact bot percentage?
No. It reports signals inside a random sample.
03Why can a large profile be unavailable?
Every sampled profile requires an individual check. If the supported volume would be exceeded, checkout remains unavailable and no payment is taken.
04Is a password required?
No, only public profiles are reviewed.
05How is this different from the basic review?
The basic report uses list data; this one opens sampled profiles individually.
Why the sample is random rather than the first two hundred
The first two hundred followers are simply the newest. They arrived in recent weeks and do not represent the account as a whole.
If followers were bought a year ago, none of that shows in the fresh top. The check returns a clean result while the problem sits below.
A random sample draws from the entire depth of the list. Two hundred examined by hand give a fairer picture than two hundred recent ones.
How this differs from the quick check
The quick check reads signals from the list itself: name, avatar, follow ratio. It costs less and suits a first look.
The deep one opens each sampled profile separately and looks inside: whether posts exist, whether the feed is active, whether the account lives.